Legal Opinion

Williams v. Tuck

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 18, 1990No. 02896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge.

This is an appeal by Gina Williams from the October 19, 1989 order granting the preliminary objections of appellee, Travelers Insurance Company, to appellant’s claim against it for attorney’s fees. 1 Appellant instituted this action against appellee 2 to recover first party benefits and attorney’s fees under the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law 3 (“MVFRL”). Appellee’s obligation to pay first party medical benefits arises due to its status as an insurance company assignee to the Assigned Claims Plan. This appeal followed the trial court’s grant of preliminary objections…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Praisner v. StockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Danko Development Corp. v. Econocast Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hodges v. RodriguezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Hagans v. Constitution State Service Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Westbrook v. RobbinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. In Re Septa Mvfrl Interest LitigationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. In Re Septa Mvfrl Interest LitigationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API