Legal Opinion

Marple Township v. Mar-Ann Holding Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1961No. Appeal, 205PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Musmanno,

The Township of Marple in Delaware County brought an action in assumpsit against Mar-Ann Hold ing Company (succeeded by Bridgmac, Inc.) as the result of an alleged defective paving and improving work done by the defendant in executing a contract entered into between plaintiff and Mar-Ann and assumed by Bridgmac. The defendant Bridgmac joined as additional defendants Nicholas A. Cardinale, Dominic Cardinale, and Frank Cardinale, individually and trading as Nicholas P. Cardinale & Co. (hereinafter referred to as Cardinale), asserting that Cardinale was at fault…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Land Title Bank & Trust Co. v. Cheltenham National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Briskman v. Greenhill Farms of Lower Merion, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brandywine Area Joint School Authority v. VanCor, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Extrudo Film Corp. v. Beck Electric Construction, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Gordon v. Leiber, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1964
  4. Kang v. Ferry, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1990
  5. Sherry & O'Leary, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API