Legal Opinion

Amory Manufacturing Co. v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1896No. 398PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Fourth District, in an appeal from Dallas County. The suit was brought by the Amory Mfg. Co., to recover from the railway company the value of the burned cotton. The trial court found that defendant was not negligent and was exempt from liability as a carrier under the terms of the bill of lading, and gave judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appgaled, and the judgment being affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals, prosecuted writ of error.

1Opinion of the Court

GAIHES, Chief Justice.

This suit was brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error to recover the value of fifty bales of cotton. The cotton was bought by J. H. Brown & Company and was placed upon the platform of a compress company at Honey Grove, Texas, for the purpose of being compressed. While it was still in possession of the compress company, and upon its platform, the defendant in error executed to Brown & Company a bill of lading therefor, in which, upon certain conditions, it bound itself to transport the cotton to Manchester, Hew Hampshire. After the execution of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lessee of Ewing v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  2. Menzell v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Iowa · 1870

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. DanielTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Stowers v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. Ervay, Inc. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  4. Texarkana & Ft. S. Ry. Co. v. BrassTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  5. Oil Belt Power Co. v. TouchstoneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API