Legal Opinion
Hong-Yee Chiu v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided November 8, 1989No. 336-79CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
ANDEWELT, Judge.
In a June 28, 1989, opinion and order, this court held that the underlying federal agency action challenged in this litigation was not “substantially justified” and, hence, that plaintiff was entitled to recover attorney’s fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (EAJA). Chiu v. United States, 17 Cl.Ct. 334 (1989). In response to that decision, plaintiff filed a proposed final accounting requesting $40,835.15 in attorney’s fees, calculated at $107.56 per hour, plus $347.20 in costs. This opinion and order considers defendant’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Joseph Trichilo v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Brigadier General Roland F. Cinciarelli v. The Honorable Ronald Reagan, President of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Ferdinand Oliveira v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Haitian Refugee Center, an Unincorporated, Not for Profit Organization v. Edwin Meese, III , Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Zulema De La Garza Perales, Cross-Appellants v. Richard Casillas, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Pohl Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Levernier Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Brown v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2015