Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marvin v. Marvin

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 11, 1981No. Civ. 59130Published

1Dissent

KLEIN, P. J.—I dissent.

This case was tried by the court sitting without a jury over a three-month period, during which time presumably extensive evidence was taken. The trial court was able to evaluate the parties and witnesses as they appeared and gave testimony. However, since the record on this appeal consists only of the judgment roll rather than a reporter’s transcript, we do not know the extent and nature of the evidence presented, or whether the issues as framed by the pleadings were expanded during the trial.

We do know that at the conclusion of the trial, the trial court awarded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Mercer - Fraser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. MacHado v. MacHadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API