Legal Opinion

Chesapeake Transit Co. v. Mott

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 15, 1909No. 18PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

In the court below, the Chesapeake Transit Company, hereafter called the plaintiff, brought an action of assumpsit, for use of A. M. Kerr and J. Edward Cole, against Abram C. Mott, hereafter called the defendant. The action was to recover damages from Mott, a surety, for nonperformance by his principals, Isaac A. Walker & Son, of a contract with the plaintiff to build a steam railroad from Norfolk, Va., to Cape Henry. In pursuance of the Pennsylvania practice act of May 25, 1887, which requires the plaintiff to file “a concise statement of the plaintiff’s demand,”…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goehrig v. StrykerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. City of Fergus Falls v. Illinois Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Isaacson v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API