Legal Opinion

E. S. Karoly Electrical Construction Co. v. Globe Savings Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 27, 1896PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Assumpsit, on checks. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Philip Stein, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waterman

It appears that these checks were made payable to a man who called himself, and was believed by the maker of the checks to be, Gr. Budelius. This man, who was dealt with as, and who called himself, Gr. Budelius, has never since been seen.

There is nothing to show that this man did not indorse the checks; no evidence that the name G. Budelius was written by any other person. In brief, no showing that his name was forged.

The fact that a man named G. Budelius has been found who testifies that the signatures on the backs of the checks are not his, does not establish that the signatures are not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pacific Express Co. v. ShearerIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Hoge v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1886

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McCornack v. Central State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  2. Uriola v. Twin Falls Bank & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Boatsman v. Stockmen's National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  4. People v. VarellasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. Santa Maria v. Industrial City Bank & Banking Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API