Legal Opinion

United States v. Lustyik

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 29, 2014No. 13 CR 616(VB)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

BRICCETTI, District Judge:

Defendants Robert Lustyik, Jr., Yo-hannes Thaler, and Rizve Ahmed, a/k/a “Caesar,” are charged with various federal crimes relating to an alleged bribery scheme.1 Lustyik, who at the time was a *218special agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), is accused of selling and agreeing to sell confidential FBI documents and information to Ahmed, with Thaler acting as a middleman.

Before the Court are Lustyik’s and Thaler’s motions to suppress digital evidence seized pursuant to several search warrants.2 (Docs. ## 74, 77). Thaler has also moved…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. WeyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  2. United States v. Pinto-ThomazDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  4. United States v. ScullyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  5. United States v. SwintonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API