United States v. Lustyik
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
BRICCETTI, District Judge:
Defendants Robert Lustyik, Jr., Yo-hannes Thaler, and Rizve Ahmed, a/k/a “Caesar,” are charged with various federal crimes relating to an alleged bribery scheme.1 Lustyik, who at the time was a *218special agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), is accused of selling and agreeing to sell confidential FBI documents and information to Ahmed, with Thaler acting as a middleman.
Before the Court are Lustyik’s and Thaler’s motions to suppress digital evidence seized pursuant to several search warrants.2 (Docs. ## 74, 77). Thaler has also moved…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. WeyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- United States v. Pinto-ThomazDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- United States v. ScullyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- United States v. SwintonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.