Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Golding

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 27, 2007No. 05 Civ. 7433(WCC)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff Michael Martinez brings this action against state investigators Jan Golding 1 and Michael Rogan 2 and Assistant District Attorney Michael Milza 3 for false arrest, malicious prosecution and conspiracy to violate plaintiffs Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizures, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Specifically, on February 8, 2004, Golding arrested plaintiff on suspicion of forcible rape, and the District Attorney of Broome County subsequently prosecuted him for the crime of Rape in the First Degree in…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kuck v. DanaherDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
  2. Costello v. MilanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. Celestin v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
  4. Brock v. CVS CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  5. Chan v. The City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API