Legal Opinion

In re Stuhl

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 14, 1977No. 44PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*388Conclusions of Law and Ordek of Censure

The Supreme Court concludes that the Commission’s findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence. We therefore accept the facts as established by the findings and apply the law accordingly.

*389G.S. 7A-376 (Cum. Supp. 1975) provides, in pertinent part, as follows:

“Upon recommendation of the Commission, the Supreme Court may censure or remove any justice or judge for wilful misconduct in office, ... or conduct'prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute.”

Willful misconduct in office denotes “improper and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Geiler v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Matter of EdensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. In the Matter of CrutchfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge NowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. In Re Inquiry Concerning BakerMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  5. In Re KneiflNebraska Supreme Court · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API