Shutt v. Butner
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Judge.
Though the custody and support order appealed from by the defendant can have no future effect, since the minor child’s eighteenth birthday has now passed, the rights and duties of the parties until then still require adjudication. Before the substitute plaintiff entered the picture, defendant was required to pay $35 a week for the child’s support to the child’s mother. Since the child lived with the plaintiff after his mother died, the order continuing the support payments and permitting the plaintiff to receive them was clearly justified. Defendant’s contention that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lane v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Burch v. . BushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Price v. HornCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
3Cited by11 opinions
- Colorado National Bank of Denver v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Ronollo v. JacobsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Bruce v. DyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Timberlake v. HeflinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Pavluvcik v. SullivanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.