Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lew You Ying v. Lew Kay

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1933No. 24506. Department OnePublished

1ConcurrenceBeals, C. J.

(concurring*) — I concur in the foregoing opinion, but desire to call attention to one phase of the case which was not discussed in the briefs, that is, the possible necessity for administration upon the estate of Lew Wa Hoo.

While it is true that, under the law of this state (Rem. Rev. Stat., § 1366), real property vests immediately in the heir upon the death of the ancestor, it has never been held that, under Rem. Rev. Stat., § 785, referred to in the foregoing opinion, an heir may maintain an action for the possession of real estate without alleging that no necessity for administration of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Collette v. SarrasinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Tucker v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API