Legal Opinion
Tantum v. Binz
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided October 18, 1982PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Botter, reported at 186 N.J.Super. 296, 302 (1981).
For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER, HANDLER, POLLOCK and O’HERN —6.
For affirmance —None.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tantum v. BinzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mazakas v. WrayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- P.T. & L. Construction Co. v. State, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Tantum v. BinzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. CovenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Eagle Fire v. FIRST INDEM. INS.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.