Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Wells Fargo Bank
District Court, D. Utah
Decided November 29, 2017No. Case 2:16-cv-00966-CW-DBPPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RESERVING RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION PENDING A SUMMARY TRIAL
Clark Waddoups, United' States District Judge
Sixty-seven plaintiffs1 have sued Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo & Company (“Wells Fargo”) for engaging in various unauthorized and fraudulent activities using them personal information. (See ECF No. 69 (Third Am. Compl. [hereinafter “TAC”]).) Plaintiffs purport to represent a class of individuals .who opened accounts with or purchased services from Wells Fargo, or a bank later acquired by Wells Fargo, and/or were notified that…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Barclay v. iFit Health & Fitness Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
- Barclay v. iFit Health & Fitness Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- Born v. Progrexion TeleservicesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020
- Butnick v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2021
- Clements v. Alto Trust Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2023
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.