Legal Opinion

J. M. v. Or. Youth Auth.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 2019No. CC 14C15773 (CA A162416) (SC S065487)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

**234Sixteen years after he had been sexually abused by an Oregon Youth Authority (OYA) employee, plaintiff initiated this action. At issue on review is plaintiff's 42 USC section 1983 claim against defendant Lawhead, former superintendent of the OYA facility where the abuse had occurred. Plaintiff alleged that defendant had violated his federal constitutional rights through deliberate indifference to the risk that the OYA employee would sexually abuse youths housed at the facility. The trial court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's section 1983 claim on the basis…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Piotrowski v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eddy v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Lowell v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. Western States Land Reliance Trust v. Linn CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. Western States Land Reliance Trust v. Linn CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. Carrie Hart, Personal Representative of the Estate of James Bourelle, deceased v. Curry County, a municipal corporation, by and through the Curry County Sheriff’s Office; State of Oregon, by and through the Oregon State Police; The City of Brookings, Oregon, by and through the Brookings Police Department; and John Doe Law EnforcementDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API