Legal Opinion
Wasserman v. Locatelli
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 22, 1961PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.
The petitioner is an attorney who seeks declaratory relief with respect to his fees for services ren dered to Emily K. Locatelli (Emily), for whom the Old Colony Trust Company, the corporate respondent, is conservator. After a hearing in the Probate Court, the judge entered a decree that the petitioner was entitled to $22,225.66, less $15,560.94 already received. The respondents appealed.
The evidence is reported. The judge made no findings of fact; and no report of material facts was requested by the parties. The decree imports a finding of every fact essential to its support. It is our duty…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cummings v. National Shawmut Bank of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Coe v. CoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Lydia E. Pinkham Medicine Co. v. GoveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Attorney General v. City of WoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Colbert v. HennesseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
- Cooney v. MontanaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Massa v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
- Sullivan v. GouletteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Strand v. HubbardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.