In re Board's Main Extension Rules N.J.A.C. 14:3-8.1
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
BAXTER, J.A.D.
In this appeal, we address the question of whether, and to what extent, our 2009 opinion in In re Centex Homes, LLC, 411 N.J.Super. 244, 985 A.2d 649 (App.Div.2009) should have retroactive effect. In Centex, we invalidated as ultra vires the 2005 Board of Public Utilities (BPU or the Board) regulations known as the Main Extension Rules, N.J.A.C. 14:3-8.1 to -8.13. The Main Extension Rules required utility companies to pay for the extension of utility lines to new homes in designated “smart growth” areas of the State, but forced the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. AfanadorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Russo v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, POLICE.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- Pascucci v. VagottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Borough of Neptune City v. Borough of Avon-By-The-SeaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. KAREN K. CLEIRBAUT (2018-025, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019