Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stegall v. Stegall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 17, 1994No. 268PA93Published

1DissentJustice Meyer

Finding that N.C.G.S. § 50-ll(a) acts as an absolute bar of an action for equitable distribution or alimony brought after the divorce, I conclude that the Court of Appeals was correct in determining that plaintiff’s claims in this case were barred.

Chapter 50 establishes the specific rules under which claims for equitable distribution and alimony may be brought. The statute clearly states that such actions may not be brought “[a]fter a judgment of divorce” because at that time, “all rights arising out of the marriage . . . cease.” N.C.G.S. § 50-ll(a) (1993). The statute allows preservation of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Food Stores v. North Carolina Board of Alcoholic ControlSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Batten v. N.C. Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Stachlowski v. StachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Collins v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. MyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API