Legal Opinion

Dehm v. Dehm

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1976No. 13964Published

1Opinion of the Court

545 P.2d 525 (1976)

Henry C. DEHM, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

Yvonne Geraldine DEHM, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 13964.

Supreme Court of Utah.

January 14, 1976.

Bryce E. Roe, of Roe & Fowler, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Harley W. Gustin, of Gustin & Gustin, Salt Lake City, for defendant-respondent.

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Plaintiff filed a motion to reduce or eliminate alimony on the ground there had been a substantial change of circumstances in the earning capability of defendant since the entry of a decree of divorce in June, 1967. Defendant filed an answer and counter-motion seeking an…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. O'Hair v. O'HairArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Thiessen v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Borchert v. BorchertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  4. Levy v. LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Dehm v. DehmUtah Supreme Court · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API