Mast v. . Raper
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Special Phooeeding heard on appeal, at Spring Term, 1879, of Foesyth Superior Court; before Schenclc, J. The opinion contains the facts. From the judgment below, the defendants Wilson & Shober appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.
The plaintiff, as administrator with the will annexed of Margaret Gardner, applies by petition to the superior court clerk of Forsyth for license to sell, for the payment of her debts, a tract of land in said county devised by the testatrix to her two children Margaret E. and Sarah L. Paper. The devisees and also N. H. D: Wilson and Charles E. Shober, partners of the firm of Wilson & Shober, and John H. Welborn, each of whom asserts a lien on the land, are made defendants, in order that their conflicting claims may be determined in the action. Wilson & Shober and John H. Welborn file answers,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ohio Life Insurance & Trust Co. v. LedyardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
- McCollum v. HinckleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1837
- Lord v. . MeroneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- Harrison v. . StyresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
3Cited by2 opinions
- Scott v. . TimberlakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- Stenhouse v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880