Legal Opinion

Stenhouse v. . Davis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1880PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion of plaintiffs for an Injunction heard at Chambers in July, 1877, as of Spring Term, 1877, of Mecklenbuhg Superior Court, before Cloud, J. The motion was granted and the defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The plaintiffs surviying members of the partnership firm of Stenhouse, Macaulay & Co., in their complaint allege that the defendant M. L. Davis, administrator of J. H. Davis, finding it necessary to convert his intestate’s real estate into assets for the payment of debts, obtained license from the probate court, and on October 26, 1869, among others, sold the tract of land described in the complaint for the sum of eleven thousand three hundred and fifty-one dollars and fifty cents, on a credit of twelve months with interest from date, to his co-defendant and sister-in-law, Sue H. Davis ; that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mast v. . RaperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Casualty Co. v. . LawingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. LawingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API