State v. Trebilcock
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Jeffrey and Rebecca Trebilcock appeal their bench trial convictions and sentences for criminal mistreatment in the first degree of J.T. and criminal mistreatment in the third degree of A.T. We reject Rebecca’s1 arguments that her sentence violates due process because the trial judge relied on his own personal religious preferences when sentencing her, her exceptional sentence violates her Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment2 rights to a jury determination of aggravating factors, and her exceptional sentence improperly relies on impermissible factors. In the unpublished portion of this opinion,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. ArnettOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. HalmNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hawkins v. AndrewjeskiDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2023
- State of Washington v. Daniel Herbert DunbarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State of Washington v. Jonathan Brook HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- State v. TrebilcockWashington Supreme Court · 2015