Legal Opinion

Smith v. . Suitt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeksoN, J.

Tbe questions involved: (1) Under tbe facts as alleged in tbe complaint — Is a life tenant alone chargeable with tbe cost of permanent improvements on property in which she owns only a life estate and which improvements tend to enhance tbe value of tbe remainder-man’s estate as well as her own? We think so. (2) At tbe request of a life tenant will tbe court order a sale of property for partition • and division or reinvestment? We think not in a partition proceeding. Upon proper showing a sale for reinvestment can be bad in an equitable proceeding or under C. S., 1744.

As to the first question,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pendleton v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  2. Merritt v. . ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Pritchard v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. Gillespie v. . AllisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. Middleton v. . RigsbeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bryant v. . ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Pendleton v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. Scott v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Stepp v. . SteppSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Hall v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API