Legal Opinion
GOYDOS v. RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 28, 2024No. 3:19-cv-08966Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JAMES S. GOYDOS, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 19-08966 (GC) (DEA) v. MEMORANDUM OPINION RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. CASTNER, District Judge This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiffs James Goydos and Maria E. Martins’s motion to dismiss Defendant Rutgers, the State University’s (Rutgers) counterclaims, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (Rule) 12(b)(6), and for leave to amend the operative complaint. (ECF Nos. 112, 121.) Rutgers opposed, and Plaintiffs replied. (ECF Nos. 124,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Davis v. Wells Fargo, U.S.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Rotella v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.