John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Magers

For the reason that there is no substantia] dispute in regard to the evidence in this case an effort will be made to state the facts as concisely as possible with the respective contentions of the parties.

Magers suffered an accident in 1933 and, since that time, has not been able on account thereof, or on account of disease, to look after his extensive farming interests, except by employing a foreman, and through the assistance of his wife, a daughter, and a son-in-law. At the time of his injury the insurance policies sued on in this case were in full force and effect. For a period of five…