Legal Opinion
Lee v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 7, 1990No. 88-1747, 88-1993 and 88-2255PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
561 So.2d 373 (1990)
Cecil E. LEE and Irma M. Lee, Appellants,
v.
SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Appellee.
Nos. 88-1747, 88-1993 and 88-2255.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 7, 1990.
Rehearing Denied June 4, 1990.
T. Michael McLeod of Kerrigan, Estess & Rankin, Pensacola, and Joel S. Perwin of Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin & Perwin, Miami, for appellants.
J. Nixon Daniel, III, of Beggs & Lane, Pensacola, for appellee.
BARFIELD, Judge.
We agree with appellants that the trial court abused its discretion in directing the verdict for the defendant…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wackenhut Corp. v. CantySupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Ford Motor Co. v. KikisSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- FLA. FIRST NAT. BANK OF JACKSONVILLE v. DentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. v. VroomDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Kinsey v. KellyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brown v. Estate of StuckeySupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- Cintrón Adorno v. GómezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1999
- Miller v. AffleckDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Estate of Stuckey v. BrownDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Nayda Cintron Adorno Y Otros V Jose A. GomezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1999