Legal Opinion
Silver-Ruth Inc. v. Rafferty
New York District Court
Decided May 5, 1964PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrancis J. Donovan, J.
In this summary proceeding, petitioner seeks to evict an apartment house superintendent Avhose employment has been terminated. The ansAver alleges that the discharge is- in violation of subdivisions 4 and 5 of section 704 of the Labor LaAv and that a proceeding is iiqav pending before the Ncav York State Labor Relations Board Avhich may result in. his reinstatement Avith back pay.
On the return day respondent moved for a stay of the eviction proceedings pending the determination of the proceedings before the Labor Relations Board. The Supreme Court has repeatedly stayed eviction proceedings…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Spezio v. Sutphin-Flushing Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- Cantelli v. Town Board of Oyster BayNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- University Gardens Property Owners Ass'n v. SteinbergNew York District Court · 1963
3Cited by8 opinions
- Vargas v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Markese v. Cooper, New York County Courts1972
- Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co. v. MillerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1966
- Romag Realty Corp. v. SaundersCivil Court of the City of New York · 1974
- 660 Riverside Drive Aldo Associates L. L. C. v. MarteCivil Court of the City of New York · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.