Legal Opinion

Clarence Stanek v. Trailmobile, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 15, 1960No. 12969PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJOR, Circuit Judge.

On October 14, 1957, plaintiff, a truck driver of the State of Wisconsin, commenced this action against defendant, a Delaware corporation licensed to and doing business in the State of Wisconsin. The action was for damages resulting from the alleged misrepresentation by defendant of the year of manufacture of a refrigerated trailer sold to plaintiff by defendant on December Í9, 1956. It was alleged that defendant represented the trailer as a 1954 model when, as a matter of fact, it was a 1949 model. The sale price was $5,900, of which $1,200 was paid at the time of sale,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lichter v. GossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  2. Pure Oil Co. v. ByrnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Ketterer v. Bay View Nash Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. John S. Kirby, D/B/A Quik-Chek of Indiana and Quik-Chek, Inc. v. P. R. Mallory & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  2. Bob Willow Motors, Inc., a Wisconsin Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Harold H. Emch, Jr., and Elizabeth R. Emch, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Harold H. Emch v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API