Legal Opinion

Ketterer v. Bay View Nash Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEschweileR, J.

Assuming that the testimony in the case was sufficient to warrant a finding that the plaintiff was informed by defendant and believed the fact to be that the car *346was a new car direct from the factory instead of being a car previously sold to and used by another, nevertheless ^such a finding affords no proper support for the judgment below.

Although we may take judicial notice that in such a sale a new rather than a used car may be presumed, prima facie at least, as intended to be the subject matter of the sale (Fox v. Boldt, 172 Wis. 333, 344, 178 N. W. 467, 179 N. W. 1), and of the fact that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hall v. BellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Stockhausen v. OehlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Fox v. BoldtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Weber v. MyhreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Donovan v. Aeolian Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Clarence Stanek v. Trailmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API