Legal Opinion

Sun Insurance v. White

California Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1898No. S. F. No. 1111PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City of San Francisco. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Action for the foreclosure of a mortgage executed to the plaintiff by the defendant George E. White. The appellant, Frankie White, was made a defendant under the allegation that she claims an interest in the property which is subordinate to the lien of the plaintiff’s mortgage. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant Frankie White has appealed directly therefrom.

The note and mortgage upon which the action is brought were executed November 1, 1888, and the action was commenced May 19, 1894. In 1885 White commenced an action against the appellant for divorce, in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. ElliottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  2. Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Lord v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Sapp v. WightmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Powell v. CampbellNevada Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mayberry v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Head v. CrawfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. California Filter Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. White v. WiseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Head v. CrawfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API