Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1883PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Application for a writ of prohibition.

1Per curiam

A judgment was rendered in the Justices’ Court in favor of the plaintiff, and against the defendant in an action, wherein one A. Wilhelm was plaintiff, and this petitioner defendant, from which the defendant appealed “ on questions of law.” The judgment was reversed, and a new trial ordered in the Superior Court. Petitioner prays the Superior Court, and judge thereof may be restrained by prohibition from trying the case.

The demand of petitioner herein is not sustained by Rickey v. Superior Court, 59 Cal. 661; nor by Sanborn v. Superior Court, 60 Cal. 425. In the first of the cases it was said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Railroad v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Rickey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Sanborn v. Superior Court of Contra Costa Cty.California Supreme Court · 1882
  4. People ex rel. Hitchcock v. FreelonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Myrick v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Beaulieu Vineyard v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  3. Fabretti v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Harvey v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Armantage v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API