Legal Opinion

Unisource Worldwide, Inc. v. Carrara

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided February 19, 2003No. 03-1015PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MIHM, District Judge.

Plaintiff Unisource Worldwide, Inc. (Un-isource) has sought a preliminary injunction in this case to prevent the Defendants from breaching their covenants not to compete with Unisource and disclosing Uni-source’s trade secrets and confidential information.

A preliminary injunction is warranted if the movant can demonstrate: (1) a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits, (2) no adequate remedy at law, (3) irreparable harm if preliminary relief is denied that outweighs the irreparable harm the non-moving party will suffer if the injunction is granted, and (4)…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mil-Mar Shoe Company, Incorporated v. Shonac CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. AutoMed Technologies, Inc. v. EllerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
  3. Eichmann v. National Hospital & Health Care Services, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Abbott-Interfast Corp. v. HarkabusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Revcor, Inc. v. Fame, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. SKF USA, INC. v. BjerknessDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  2. Burbank Grease Services, LLC v. SokolowskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
  3. Pampered Chef v. AlexanianDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  4. Morris Silverman Management Corp. v. Western Union Financial Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
  5. CDW LLC v. NETech Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API