Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 3, 1933No. 9512PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Circuit Judge.

The appellee as plaintiff brought this action against appellant for the recovery of damages on account of breach of contract. The parties will be referred to as they were designated in the lower court.

Prior to July 12, 19-24, the Youngberg Construction Company, not a corporation but a trade-name, was engaged in the construction of certain roads, viaducts, culverts, and bridges under contract, in the states of North and South Dakota. The plaintiff, Fidelity & Deposit Company, had executed numerous bonds for this company, guaranteeing its performance of the construction…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Casey v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  4. Illinois Power & Light Corporation v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  5. Lowrey v. HawaiiSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. General Casualty & Surety Co. v. KiersteadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  2. Grinnell Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API