Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Hyatte
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided September 24, 2024No. 3:22-cv-00286Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION JEREMY BLANCHARD, CASE NO. 3:21-CV-160-CCB-SJF JAKE PRISCAL, 3:22-CV-165-CCB-SJF WILLIAM ANDERSON, 3:22-CV-286-CCB-SJF DAMION PRYOR, 3:22-CV-582-CCB-SJF Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM HYATTE, et al., Defendants. OPINION and ORDER Ripe before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees filed in both Blanchard v. Hyatte, 3:21-cv-160-CCB-SJF [DE 81] and Anderson v. Hyatte, 3:22-cv-286- CCB-SJF [DE 18]. For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiffs’ motion will be granted. I. Background The above-captioned cases are four…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Kenneth Spegon v. The Catholic Bishop of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Pickett v. Sheridan Health Care CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.