Adams v. Tuxedo Land Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiff began this action to recover damages for injuries sustained in an automobile collision alleged to have been due to the negligence of John Stange, an employee of the Tuxedo Land Company. The defendants had judgment and the plaintiff appeals.
Only two questions are presented for consideration: First: Was the defendant John Stange guilty of negligence, proximately causing the injury? And, second: Was he, at the time of the collision, acting within the scope of his employment as a laborer of the Tuxedo Land Company?
The appellant urges an additional point for consideration, to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kish v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Mauchle v. Panama-Pacific Internatonal Exposition Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
- Nussbaum v. Traung Label & Lithograph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
3Cited by12 opinions
- Peccolo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Gipson v. Davis Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Western Pipe & Steel Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Cain v. MarquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Martinelli v. StabnauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.