Reed v. State

MORROW, Presiding Judge,

(dissenting). — The writer is unable to concur in the affirmance of the judgment.

The State relied upon the testimony of Earl Henry and his wife. Henry testified that he and the appellant made whisky together at the home of Henry, and described in detail the manner in which it was done, and on cross-examination testified that it was done moré than once, that his wife was present; that, the kitchen stove was used in making the whisky; that she took no actual part in the making of it.

Mrs. Henry testified that appellant and her husband made whisky at her house twice; that…