Legal Opinion

Robert v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 17, 1920No. 5971PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

This conviction is for a violation of the Dean prohibition law.

Motion to dismiss the appeal is made upon the ground that the recognizance is insufficient, in that it does not comply with the statute. It recites that appellant stands charged with “violation of the liquor law.” This is not sufficient under the decisions of this court to describe the offense for which he stands charged, nor does it recite the punishment awarded appellant. It is necessary under the form prescribed by the Legislature that the amount of the punishment be stated in the recognizance.

For the…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Privitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Chandler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Chandler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Craig v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Ex Parte CochrainCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API