Legal Opinion

State v. Baker

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 19, 1979PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODFREY, Justice.

Defendants Judith A. Baker and Philip J. White were indicted for “furnishing marijuana,” 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1106 (1979), and “trafficking in hypodermic apparatuses,” 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1110 (1979). Convicted after a jury trial, they now appeal, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support the convictions. Defendant White appeals also the denial of his motion, made during trial, to suppress evidence. In the case of each defendant, we deny the appeal from the conviction for “furnishing marijuana” but sustain the appeal from the conviction for “trafficking in hypodermic…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. McKeoughSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  3. State v. BishopSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. Redden v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
  5. Commonwealth v. HuntSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. TrueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. State v. AndersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  3. State v. CoteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. State v. MichaudSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API