Legal Opinion
Mooring v. Kaufman
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 14, 1983No. [No. 141, September Term, 1982.]PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRodowsky, J.
Substituted service of original process was attempted in this case pursuant to Maryland Rule 107 a 3. The writ of summons was quashed and the Plaintiff appeals from that order. We shall hold that the order in this case is an appealable final judgment. We shall also affirm because the record shows that, at the time of the attempted service, the premises at which substituted service was undertaken were not the "dwelling house or usual place of abode” of the Defendant, as required by MD. R. 107 a 3.
Appellant, Barbara Ann Mooring (Plaintiff), by a declaration filed in the Eighth Judicial Circuit…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Feinstein v. BergnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Sara A. Karlsson v. Baruch RabinowitzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Dobkin v. ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Mohamed v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Houghton v. County Comm'rs of Kent Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Pickett v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Houghton v. COUNTY COM'RS OF KENT CTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Wilde v. SwansonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Bailey v. WoelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.