Legal Opinion

Estate of Thompson v. Thompson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1933PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed April 11, 1933 :

Rosenberry, C. J.

The first contention made is that the county court being a court of special and limited jurisdiction, for that reason, there being no presumptions in favor of its jurisdiction, the county court was without jurisdiction by reason of its failure to conform to the statutory provisions and the court rules which require (a) notice of the settlement of the executor’s account to be given in accordance with the provisions of sec. 317.11 of the Statutes or County Court Rule XV, sec. 1; (b) a guardian ad litem to be appointed for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crocker v. DillonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  2. Richter v. Estate of LeibyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Karel v. PerelesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Estate of George v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Hamilton v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Will of Jaeger v. LademanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Old Republic Surety Co. v. ErlienCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  5. O'Neill v. Maryland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API