Legal Opinion

Smoldt v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 28, 2000No. C96110508; CA A97994Published

1Opinion of the Court

7 P.3d 638 (2000)

168 Or. App. 657

Richard SMOLDT, Appellant,

v.

HENKELS & McCOY, INC., Respondent.

(C96110508; CA A97994)

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted September 28, 1998.

Decided June 28, 2000.

Jacqueline L. Koch, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the briefs was Findling & Johnson LLP.

Dian Rubanoff, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Paula A. Barran and Lane Powell Spears Lubersky LLP.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM and BREWER,[*] Judges.

BREWER, J.

Plaintiff appeals from summary judgment in favor of defendant, his…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Livadas v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. J. I. Case Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API