Legal Opinion

Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co. v. Briscoe

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 2, 1922No. 2756PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern. E'istrict of Pennsylvania; Oliver B. Dickinson, Judge. Action at law by Catherine Briscoe, administratrix of the estate of Jickson Briscoe, deceased, against the Philadelphia & Reading Rail-w ay Company. Judgment for plaintiff (274 Fed. 476), and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Circuit Judge.

This suit was brought by Catherine Brísele, plaintiff below, for the death of her husband, Jackson Briscoe, under the federal Employer’s Fiability Act (Comp. St. §§ 8657-8665), *681as administratrix, on behalf of herself and three children, Iiva, Mable, and Helen, aged 6, 10, and 12 years, respectively, at the time of his death. He was employed as a brakeman by the Philadelphia & Reading Railroad Company on one of its freight trains, engaged in interstate commerce. On November 2, 1920, train No. 58, of whose crew Briscoe was a member, came from. Tamaqua to the borough of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McGinnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HollowaySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Union Pacific Railroad v. HuxollSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co. v. MarlandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dow v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. Tompkins v. Pilots Ass'n for Bay and River DelawareDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. McGlothan v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Tufts v. CongerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API