Legal Opinion

Tufts v. Conger

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFRitz, J.

Under the provisions of § 688, title 46, and § 51, title 45, USCA, the $7,500 paid as damages for the death of Melvin Tufts, deceased, while employed as a seaman, are for “the benefit of the surviving widow or husband and children of such employee.” The deceased was lawfully married to Viola Tufts, his first wife,'on April 12, 1922, and they had two children, Melvin Tufts, Jr., born November 11, 1922, and Donald Tufts, born November 10, 1925. Upon the wife’s complaint, a judgment of divorce was entered on June 25, 1927, in an action in a circuit court of this state, .where they resided, but…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. GotschallSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Fogarty v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Southern Ry. Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stark v. Chicago, North Shore & Milwaukee Ry. Co. Appeal of StarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  2. Lawson v. United States. Retz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  3. Hoffman v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API