Legal Opinion

Murphy v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1993No. 63378PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant was charged by indictment as a class X offender with burglary in the first degree, § 569.160, RSMo 1986, and stealing over $150, § 570.030, RSMo 1986. Movant pled guilty to both charges. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the State recommended that movant be sentenced as a persistent offender to concurrent sentences of fifteen years on the burglary charge and ten years on the stealing charge. The court followed the State’s recommendation.

Movant’s sole point on appeal alleges…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fox v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Pines v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Warren v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Cobb v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Nebbitt v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MortonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Sharp v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. McNeal v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API