Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Stark

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1893No. 16,957PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Parke Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

Appellees brought suit against appellants to enjoin the collection of certain taxes.

The court overruled a separate demurrer of each of the appellants to the complaint,' for want of sufficient facts, and appellants refusing to plead further, and electing to stand on their demurrer, judgment was rendered upon said demurrer enjoining the tax.

The errors assigned, separately and jointly, are that the court erred in overruling each of said demurrers.

The complaint, after the title, is as follows:

“That plaintiffs are a firm, and have an office, as such, doing a banking business, with a view to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Kuntz v. SumptionIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Hoover v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Meridian Hills Country Club v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Tax Court · 1987
  2. Board of Children's Guardians v. ShutterIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Bank of Jonesboro v. HamptonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Jones v. Rushville National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Lakeview Country Club, Inc. v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Tax Court · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API