Legal Opinion
Wasserman v. Franklin County
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided January 28, 2025No. S23G1029PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
320 Ga. 624
FINAL COPY S23G1029. WASSERMAN v. FRANKLIN COUNTY. PINSON, Justice. The Georgia Constitution grants Georgia courts the judicial power. This power allows courts to resolve controversies about the relative rights and obligations of the parties before us, and to enter judgments that bind the parties to those decisions. The limits of this power are enforced in part through the doctrine of standing, which imposes threshold requirements that a party must meet to maintain a lawsuit. In Sons of Confederate Veterans v. Henry County Bd. of Commissioners.,
315 Ga. 39
( 880 SE2d 168) (2022)…
2Cases cited111 opinions
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE v. ETERNAL VIGILANCE ACTION, INC. (Two Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2025
- State v. WiersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2025
- Atlantic Games, Inc. v. Georgia Lottery CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia · 2025
- COX-OTT v. BARNES & THORNBURG, LLPSupreme Court of Georgia · 2025
- Stephens v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2025
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.