Legal Opinion

Murphy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 7, 1971No. 71-205PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

On appeal by the defendant from conviction of unlawful possession of a narcotic drug, the contention presented is that the trial court committed error in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained upon search following arrest and in denying defendant’s motion for acquittal at the close of the plaintiff’s case, on the ground that the arrest was unlawful.

*262The officer who made the arrest had observed the defendant in the commission of a felony for which he subsequently was arrested. The officer had filed charges with the state attorney for issuance of an arrest warrant.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gossett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. FriersonSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  2. Wigfall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. State v. FoustDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  5. Clark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API