Legal Opinion

State v. Foust

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 30, 1972No. 72-293PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

262 So.2d 686 (1972)

STATE of Florida, Appellant,

v.

Rodney FOUST, Appellee.

No. 72-293.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 30, 1972.

Richard E. Gerstein, State's Atty., and Richard R. Snyder, Asst. State's Atty., for appellant.

David Goldman, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PEARSON, Judge.

The State of Florida instituted this interlocutory appeal after the trial court entered an order granting the appellee's motion to suppress evidence.[1] The evidence in question was seized when the appellee was arrested pursuant to the authority of two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. GustafsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  2. State v. HolmesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  3. Murphy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. FriersonSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  2. Willingham v. City of OrlandoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. Wigfall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. McBath v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
  5. Jacobs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API