Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Haynes

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1973No. KCD 26752PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Chief Judge.

On a verified petition which alleged that petitioner had fully served a sentence imposed on him and was, therefore, entitled to immediate release, we issued our writ of habeas corpus. We now conclude that on the entire record, the writ was improvidently issued and should be quashed.

This court has accumulated a gargantuan file of correspondence from the petitioner, the public defender, and the Attorney General’s office, but the pleadings of both petitioner and of the State are inadequate for the necessity of the case.

Shorn of the confusion engendered by the pleadings,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. AmsdenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. State v. WhiteakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  3. State v. TestermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  4. Conner v. HerdMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Higlin v. KaiserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Meeks v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Harkins v. LaufSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. Application of HoltMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. State Ex Rel. Lightfoot v. SchriroMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. White v. WyrickDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API