Legal Opinion

K&K Jump Start/Chargers, Inc. v. Schumacher Electric Corp.

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided June 7, 2000No. 98-0905-CV-W-6Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SACHS, District Judge.

Pending are defendant’s motions for new trial or for judgment as a matter of law. I now decide that defendant is entitled to prevail in this patent infringement case as a matter of law, notwithstanding plaintiffs’ trial success with the jury. I rely on the second point on which I requested briefing in my post-trial memorandum, Doc. 108.

On reconsideration of a pretrial issue belatedly presented a few days before trial (Doc. 84) I conclude that Tronzo 1 controls, and that the backdating of plaintiffs’ rights to the Canadian application, which is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dr. Raymond G. Tronzo v. Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. K & K Jump Start/Chargers, Inc. v. Schumacher Electric Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API